Might have come up before but I'll throw it out there just in case.
Any chance at more than one promoting instructor?
Fairly common to have the instructors instructor 'sign off' on things or a team of instructors come to a unified decision.
I'd like the ability to acknowledge all directly involved in my training and promotions.
Maybe a 'promoted by...' and an 'Authorized by...'
Could be useful for heads of affiliations to be able to confirm instructors who can promote 'for them' instead of constantly verifying that they 'promoted' someone when really their daily coach did and they just observed them not making a fool of themselves at a seminar. Still nods to the lineage and keeps them involved without having to be completely hands on.
For instance, John Will 'promoted' me... Really the team of coaches put me forward and John trusts them.
"Might have come up before but I'll throw it out there just in case. Any chance at more than one promoting instructor? Fairly common to have the instructors instructor 'sign off' on things or a team of instructors come to a unified decision. I'd like the ability to acknowledge all directly involved in my training and promotions. Maybe a 'promoted by...' and an 'Authorized by...' Could be useful for heads of affiliations to be able to confirm instructors who can promote 'for them' instead of constantly verifying that they 'promoted' someone when really their daily coach did and they just observed them not making a fool of themselves at a seminar. Still nods to the lineage and keeps them involved without having to be completely hands on. For instance, John Will 'promoted' me... Really the team of coaches put me forward and John trusts them. Just me?"
You can already write that as free text in the "Promoted by" field, but even though I like the idea of being able to tag more than one promoting instructor (who can confirm the promotion individually), I really don't think Beltchecker should have a field labeled "authorized by", as that is a quite controversial practice, nulling out the usual belt requirements to promote someone to a certain belt. Either you were (co)promoted by someone legit or you weren't promoted by someone legit. If you were promoted by someone not legit authorized by someone legit (who did not co-promote, even by proxy), you were still promote by someone not legit.
It is another thing that someone who is very rarely on Beltchecker can write in their profile (possible already now) that "I'm very rarely online here myself, but promotions from me that are verified by XXXX XXXX (my most senior student) can be trusted just as if I had confirmed the promotions myself". I've never seen anyone do that yet, but I would be totally fine with it. Still not same as "authorized by".
i dont know if this is the best place, but i think i found a small bug.
Whenever i am at my coaches page, the Thumbnail of the coach seem to point to my own profile, while the "text" of the name is linked to the coaches profile.
It is a kind of magic after the relaunch:
I didn‘t receive any vote,
I didn‘t receive any reaction to my votes,
I didn‘t have had any individual interaction (wall notice, pm, etc.) on the platform at all.
-Is there a new „ghost“- modus I didn’t notice and I am in?
"It is a kind of magic after the relaunch:
I didn‘t receive any vote,
I didn‘t receive any reaction to my votes,
I didn‘t have had any individual interaction (wall notice, pm, etc.) on the platform at all.
-Is there a new „ghost“- modus I didn’t notice and I am in?"
New interface and lack of activity on your profile likely has nothing to do with each other, sorry 🙂
